Games

Retailer Lists Monolith Soft as Developer for Zelda: Ocarina of Time Remake

6 September 2026
Nintendo Switch 2
6 min.
WhatsAppMessengerLinkedInRedditPinterestBufferSMS
Retailer Lists Monolith Soft as Developer for Zelda: Ocarina of Time Remake

Summary:

Recently a Norwegian retailer, Elkjøp, published a product listing that names Monolith Soft as the developer for The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time remake for Nintendo Switch 2. That listing has reignited discussion among fans about who is handling one of Nintendo’s most cherished titles, especially given Monolith Soft’s growing role on high-profile Nintendo projects. Major outlets picked up the retailer page and reported the claim, while Nintendo has not offered an official confirmation naming a developer. For readers who follow Nintendo rumors and Switch 2 news, this is an important detail to track – retailer pages can be right, they can be placeholders, or they can simply be mistakes. Below we break down what the listing shows, why Monolith Soft would be a logical pick, how trustworthy retailer pages usually are, what signals to watch for next, and how to verify the story for yourself. If you want more Nintendo rumor coverage, visit our Nintendo Rumors hub and our ongoing Switch 2 coverage.

What the Elkjøp Zelda: Ocarina of Time listing actually shows

The product page on Elkjøp lists “The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time” for Nintendo Switch 2 and includes Monolith Soft as the developer in its metadata. The page also includes a product code and a PEGI rating entry, which is common for pre-listings that electronics retailers publish ahead of major launches. Retail listings often draw on distributor metadata or local catalog feeds, and sometimes those feeds include a developer field. In this case the developer field names Monolith Soft – a detail that matters because it points to a concrete studio rather than a generic label like Nintendo or “Internal”. That specificity is why outlets picked up the story and why fans have started to weigh the likelihood of Monolith Soft being the studio behind a modern remake of Ocarina of Time. At the same time, retailer pages can contain placeholders or errors, so the listing is a signal worth watching but not definitive proof of who is leading development.

Why Monolith Soft would be a sensible candidate

Monolith Soft has built a reputation for large-scale world building through series like Xenoblade Chronicles and for being a trusted support studio on major Nintendo first-party projects. Their hands-on work across games such as Breath of the Wild and Tears of the Kingdom has shown they can collaborate with Nintendo’s core teams while handling big technical and design tasks. Given Ocarina of Time’s scope and the ambition fans expect from a modern remake, Monolith Soft’s experience with open environments, complex quest structures, and narrative pacing makes them a logical pick on paper. That does not mean they are confirmed, but the studio’s track record explains why the Elkjøp entry raised eyebrows and why many fans reacted positively to the idea. If Monolith is involved, it could point to Nintendo assigning a trusted external team to handle the heavy lifting while internal Zelda leads oversee the direction.

What Nintendo has officially said so far

Nintendo itself has not released a statement naming Monolith Soft as the developer of an Ocarina of Time remake. Official channels have confirmed a remake exists and noted its release window, but specific developer credits for such projects often wait until closer to launch or appear on packaging and store listings later in the cycle. Nintendo reserves formal announcements for their channels – Nintendo Directs, official press releases, and product pages – so until Nintendo or the publisher explicitly credits a studio, the Elkjøp entry remains a third-party data point rather than an official confirmation. Fans should keep checking Nintendo’s updates and regional store pages, but also understand the difference between retailer metadata and publisher-confirmed credits when evaluating these rumors.

What this listing could mean for Switch 2 timing and expectations

If the Elkjøp listing is accurate, it would suggest Nintendo is collaborating with established external teams ahead of a Switch 2 release window for major Zelda projects. That might help explain the decision to remaster such an influential title now – pairing the nostalgia and brand power of Ocarina of Time with the technical capabilities of newer hardware. For players, this could mean a remake that expands environments, updates combat and camera systems, and modernizes quality of life features while preserving the core experience. However, the presence of an external studio does not guarantee a specific scope – Monolith Soft’s involvement could range from full development to a heavy support role. Until official credits are posted, treat scope expectations as speculative and focus on the concrete signals — developer credit, release dates, and official trailers.

How reliable are retailer listings for developer credits

Retailer listings can be a surprisingly good source of early information because they sometimes receive official distributor metadata before press outlets do. But they are also prone to errors – human or automated – when filling in fields like developer, release date, or even platform. Some retailers use placeholder text or draw from incomplete databases, which leads to false positives. Examples from the past show both cases: sometimes a listing prematurely reveals accurate credits, and other times it simply repeats a rumor that circulated among fans. The best approach is to treat a retailer listing as a lead: note it, cross-check it with multiple reputable outlets, and look for corroborating signals such as ratings board entries, distributor catalog confirmations, or mention in Nintendo’s own pages. If multiple independent sources echo the same developer credit, confidence increases; a lone listing should be handled with caution.

Other studios fans have mentioned and why the debate exists

When rumors surface, fans immediately debate possible developers. Grezzo, for example, handled the 3DS Ocarina of Time remake in the past and naturally appears in speculation. Smaller studios and internal Nintendo teams are also floated, which is why a specific listing naming Monolith Soft stood out – it shifted discussion away from historical precedents toward a studio known for modern, large-scale projects. The debate exists because Nintendo sometimes spreads work across multiple teams: internal groups handle franchise oversight while outside studios tackle ports, remakes, or enhancements. That makes it harder to read a single credit as the full picture. Community discussion is healthy, but it helps to separate historical precedent and wishful thinking from verifiable information when forming expectations.

What to watch next – verification signals and timeline clues

If you want to follow this rumor, there are clear verification signals that usually appear in this order: distributor or publisher metadata confirmations, PEGI/ESRB ratings that include developer fields, official Nintendo pages and trailers with credits, and finally packaging or digital storefront metadata showing developer names. Watch for synchronized updates across multiple Nordic and global retailers because coordinated listings are harder to mistake. Also keep an eye on reliable outlets publishing confirmations and on any statements from Monolith Soft itself, which sometimes notes involvement in larger projects on its company pages. For readers who want a single place to track rumor updates, our Nintendo Rumors section aggregates chatter and credible sightings so you don’t have to chase multiple sources.

Conclusion

The Elkjøp listing naming Monolith Soft as the developer of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time remake is an intriguing rumor that fits with what we know of Monolith’s recent role on big Nintendo projects, but it is not definitive proof. Treat the listing as an early signal: useful and newsworthy, yet unconfirmed until Nintendo or official distributor channels verify developer credits. Fans should look for corroboration across ratings boards, distributor feeds, and Nintendo’s own announcements. Until then, enjoy the speculation but keep expectations grounded – retailer metadata can be right, but it can also be a placeholder or error. Share your thoughts in the comments and check back as this story develops on NintendoReporters, where we follow Nintendo-focused news closely.

FAQs
  • Is Monolith Soft confirmed as the developer?
    • No – the Elkjøp listing names Monolith Soft, but Nintendo has not officially confirmed a developer credit yet.
  • Where did the Monolith Soft claim come from?
    • The claim appears on a Norwegian retailer page for Elkjøp, which listed the game with Monolith Soft in the developer field and was later reported by several outlets.
  • How reliable are these retailer leaks?
    • Retailer listings can be accurate but also contain placeholders or errors; use them as leads and wait for corroboration from multiple sources.
  • Could another studio be involved instead of Monolith?
    • Yes – past remakes have involved different teams like Grezzo, and Nintendo often uses multiple studios on major projects.
  • Where can I follow confirmed updates?
    • Follow official Nintendo channels and our Nintendo Rumors and Switch 2 pages for curated updates and verification signals.
Sources
WhatsAppMessengerLinkedInRedditPinterestBufferSMS